Username
Password
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Seen as we on the topic of avengers, was not the original comic version of Thor a scientist/doctor who found the hammer and thus became the mighty Thor? I remember that for the original stuff, but if there has been newer adds to the story........Just curious as Thor really was all about the Greek mythology.
Quote from: Snnow on May 08, 2012, 09:21:30 AMSeen as we on the topic of avengers, was not the original comic version of Thor a scientist/doctor who found the hammer and thus became the mighty Thor? I remember that for the original stuff, but if there has been newer adds to the story........Just curious as Thor really was all about the Greek mythology.You mean Norse Mythology . But Thor fits in with everyone and he makes sense. But The Hulk is a Mutant that comes out whenever Brunce gets angry. So why would they want a Mutant on a team that is tasked with defending earth ?. He is a lose cannon and I just think he does not belong on the Avengers at all.
Quote from: Lord Azazel on May 08, 2012, 09:27:18 AMQuote from: Snnow on May 08, 2012, 09:21:30 AMSeen as we on the topic of avengers, was not the original comic version of Thor a scientist/doctor who found the hammer and thus became the mighty Thor? I remember that for the original stuff, but if there has been newer adds to the story........Just curious as Thor really was all about the Greek mythology.You mean Norse Mythology . But Thor fits in with everyone and he makes sense. But The Hulk is a Mutant that comes out whenever Brunce gets angry. So why would they want a Mutant on a team that is tasked with defending earth ?. He is a lose cannon and I just think he does not belong on the Avengers at all.Hulk is not a mutant, he is a gamma radiation monster. And besides the X-men (mutants) save the earth frequently and some of their members are occasional avengers members. Scarlet Witch, quicksilver and wolverine for example Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
I mean he is a beast a monster and not someone you would think could be a hero. A Villan yes. On top of that.. He is a Mutant which all the other Heros are not. They all are either like Thor or have Armor that makes them a Hero. But Hulk is a Mutant and belongs with the Xmen more than the Avengers.
Quote from: Lord Azazel on May 08, 2012, 09:14:45 AMI mean he is a beast a monster and not someone you would think could be a hero. A Villan yes. On top of that.. He is a Mutant which all the other Heros are not. They all are either like Thor or have Armor that makes them a Hero. But Hulk is a Mutant and belongs with the Xmen more than the Avengers.Technicalities here, but The Hulk was created through an experiment just like Captain America. Granted, and experiment gone terribly wrong, but nonetheless a similar process.I wouldn't consider the Hulk a villain either, all the depictions of him show he just doesn't understand more then acting out of drive for doing bad or evil. If you go back to the original comics, you'll find that the Avengers group make up largely changes over time. The Hulk steps out and others come in to replace. Super villains are reformed and brought into the group, etc. If they were trying to stay true to the original comics though, they missed the boat with the original team makeup. Personally, I don't mind so much as I still thought it was a fantastic movie.Besides, it's not like we can hold true to any time line as they keep 'rebooting' these things to make them fresh or no. *sighs* How about some new material people . . . you can't tell me no one can figure out a new story line or other heros we can read about !
Basically if you have any questions you should read posts by Mad and Chobo because they are completely correct. Hulk was an Avenger at times, he is not by any mean a mutant as per marvel universe, Hawkeye was also part of the avengers and if I'm not mistaken, so was Black Widow (though this may have been the "west coast avengers". It is of course your own personal choice to see a movie or not, but your reasons are not accurate. Again, your call but you are definitely missing out on a good film. I have not red one negative review to date (though personally I preferred Ed Norton to Mark Ruffalo hehe)